|
|
|||
|
Statements on Passage
May 2008 Sen. Casey | Sen. Reid | Sen. Chambliss | Spkr. Pelosi | Rep. Peterson | Rep. McGovern Senator Bob Casey (D-Pa.) Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) This farm bill invests $8 billion in food SNAP over the next 10 years. By increasing the standard deduction and minimum monthly benefit, food SNAP will provide improved benefit levels to help low-income families put nutritious food on the table. To make food SNAP more accessible to low-income Americans, this farm bill indexes the asset limitation for inflation, exempts IRS-approved retirement and education savings accounts from the asset test, and permits a full deduction for childcare expenses. Simplified reporting requirements are extended to low-income seniors to ease their ability to obtain benefits. The improvements made in this farm bill will ensure that food SNAP continues to improve the health and nutritional well-being of millions of people in need.” Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) The overwhelming, bipartisan, and veto-proof votes of both the House and Senate will prevent the President from standing in the way of vital legislation that will reduce food prices by providing emergency assistance to farmers to help them get their products to market, and help families struggling with rising costs by increasing support for food stamp assistance, food banks, pantries, and soup kitchens. The Farm Bill’s historic $1 billion investment in energy independence and support for the transition to cellulosic ethanol will also help to reduce skyrocketing energy prices. This legislation is a strong start to reform our farm support system, and is the best Farm Bill I have ever voted for. House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson and Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Tom Harkin are to be congratulated for crafting a Farm Bill that meets the needs of farmers and ranchers while providing a historic investment in nutrition assistance to fight hunger. The strong, bipartisan votes the Farm Bill received this week on both sides of the Capitol are tributes to their outstanding leadership.” Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) We have come to a point where I believe we have a good bill that should be supported by all Members of this Congress from urban, suburban and rural areas. I have here a chart that shows how the current farm bill spending is going to be allocated on a 10-year basis, which is what we have to go by. Nutrition in this new Food, Conservation, and Energy Act is 74 percent of the spending over the next 10 years in this food bill, commodities are 16 percent. Back in 2002, these numbers were 65 and 35 or something. Conservation is 7 percent; and energy and the specialty crops, the other items, are 3 percent…. Nutrition was more than the $10 billion of new money that was put in the bill, $10.3 billion; conservation, an additional $4 billion; specialty crops, $2.3 billion; and in the commodity title, we actually had a reduction. In addition to the $58 billion that we reduced, we had another $3.6 billion that we took out of the commodity title to help put money into these other areas. Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.)
Click here for his full statement.
This bill will do more to fight hunger in America over the next five years than anything Congress has done in decades. Over $10 billion will go to improve the Food Stamp benefit, to provide fresh fruits and vegetables to children in schools around this country, and to invest in America’s food banks. Over 73 percent of the spending in this bill will fund the anti-hunger safety net. Damage that has been done over the years – the erosion of both the Food Stamp benefit and the emergency food assistance system, for example – is fixed in this bill. M. Speaker, the Nutrition Title of the Farm Bill is not perfect, but it is very good. I am voting for this bill on the strength of these improvements, and I urge my colleagues to do the same. These enhancements will improve the lives of real people around this country – people who desperately need help putting food on their tables in this time of spiking energy costs and rising food prices. This bill will help more than 10 million people afford an adequate diet, including almost 200,000 people in my home state of Massachusetts. Unfortunately, though, it won’t end hunger in America and it won’t end hunger around the world. I strongly believe hunger is political condition that requires a political solution. I believe we can end hunger here at home and around the world if we find the political will to do so. But ending hunger will take leadership – leadership to stand up to the powerful special interests that don’t care about ending hunger; leadership to stand up for the people whose interests aren’t always represented here in the Halls of Congress; leadership to simply do the right thing. And ending hunger is the right thing to do. The face of hunger here in America is not one of sunken eyes and swollen bellies. No, the hungry in America are our neighbors, our children’s classmates and the seniors we see every day. Some serve in the military and others take their kids to soccer and baseball practice all over this country. The face of hunger is the face of too many in America, but that doesn’t have to be the case any longer. This bill – the effort put forth by the anti-hunger community and by many Members of Congress – is just a start. With a continued and dedicated effort, this can truly be the beginning of the end of hunger in America. This bill is a solid down payment on our efforts to end the scourge of hunger in America once and for all, and for that reason alone it deserves our support.” |