|
[ Food Stamp Program
| Frequently Asked Questions |
2005
Eligibility Limits ]
[ Food Stamp Outreach | Characteristics
of Food Stamp Households ]
[ Food Stamp Program Participation
Data ] [Participation Access Rates]
[Application Processing Timeliness]
Printer-Friendly
Page
Food Stamp Participation Access Rates
State-by-State
USDA's Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) has calculated state-by-state
"participant access rates (PARs)" for calendar year 2003. The
PARs measure the extent to which low-income people are participating in
the Food Stamp Program. In September 2004 FNS
recognized states for superior achievements, including the states
with the highest PARS and the states with the most improved PARs. The
national average was 61 percent in 2003, up four percentage points over
2002. The PARs are distinguished from "the official participation
rates." The latter take into account not only income but other eligibility
criteria, such as citizenship status and household resources. Determining
the official rate entails a significant lag time; calculation of the PAR
allows an assessment of more recent participation trends. The Census Bureau
bases poverty on annual income while FSP eligibility is based on monthly
income. PARs are one basis for monetary awards that USDA makes under the
high performance bonuses established in the 2002 Farm Bill. Other categories
for bonus awards relate to timeliness of processing, low negative error
rates, and payment accuracy. For more information on Food Stamp Program
access issues, contact evollinger@frac.org
Participation
Rate 2003
(U.S. Average: 61.5%)
|
| |
|
|
| State |
Participation
Rate |
Ranking |
| Missouri |
103.5% |
1 |
| Oklahoma* |
96.6% |
2 |
| Maine |
91.6% |
3 |
| Oregon* |
91.4% |
4 |
| Tennessee |
91.0% |
5 |
| DC |
90.9% |
6 |
| South Carolina |
90.1% |
7 |
| Louisiana |
88.5% |
8 |
| Kentucky |
87.5% |
9 |
| Hawaii |
85.5% |
10 |
| West Virginia |
80.5% |
11 |
| Vermont |
80.1% |
12 |
| Indiana |
79.9% |
13 |
| Mississippi* |
79.9% |
14 |
| Delaware |
79.5% |
15 |
| Georgia |
77.7% |
16 |
| Alaska |
76.8% |
17 |
| North Dakota* |
75.2% |
18 |
| Michigan* |
74.4% |
19 |
| Alabama |
72.4% |
20 |
| Ohio |
71.9% |
21 |
| Arizona* |
67.7% |
22 |
| South Dakota* |
67.3% |
23 |
| Pennsylvania |
67.1% |
24 |
| Arkansas |
66.9% |
25 |
| Connecticut |
66.4% |
26 |
| Minnesota* |
64.1% |
27 |
| Idaho* |
62.5% |
28 |
| New Hampshire |
62.3% |
29 |
| Nebraska* |
62.3% |
30 |
| Rhode Island |
62.2% |
31 |
| Illinois |
61.5% |
32 |
| New Mexico* |
60.5% |
33 |
| Iowa |
60.4% |
34 |
| Wisconsin* |
58.6% |
35 |
| Kansas* |
57.1% |
36 |
| Montana* |
56.1% |
37 |
| Wyoming* |
55.3% |
38 |
| Washington* |
55.1% |
39 |
| Virginia |
54.6% |
40 |
| New York* |
54.4% |
41 |
| Texas |
53.5% |
42 |
| Maryland |
52.5% |
43 |
| North Carolina* |
52.3% |
44 |
| Utah* |
51.8% |
45 |
| Colorado* |
50.1% |
46 |
| Florida |
49.5% |
47 |
| Nevada* |
47.8% |
48 |
| Massachusetts |
47.2% |
49 |
| New Jersey |
46.8% |
50 |
| California* |
39.0% |
51 |
|
|
|
% Point Change CY 03 Less CY 02
(U.S. Average: 61.2%)
|
|
|
| State |
% Point
Change |
Ranking |
| Maine |
24.0% |
1 |
| Delaware |
22.9% |
2 |
| Oklahoma* |
22.1% |
3 |
| South Carolina |
20.2% |
4 |
| Tennessee |
16.3% |
5 |
| North Dakota* |
16.3% |
6 |
| Mississippi* |
15.4% |
7 |
| Vermont |
14.3% |
8 |
| DC |
13.2% |
9 |
| Arkansas |
12.4% |
10 |
| Idaho* |
11.8% |
11 |
| Nebraska* |
11.2% |
12 |
| Arizona* |
11.1% |
13 |
| Louisiana |
10.6% |
14 |
| Utah* |
10.6% |
15 |
| Massachusetts |
8.7% |
16 |
| Hawaii |
8.6% |
17 |
| Missouri |
8.1% |
18 |
| Colorado* |
7.6% |
19 |
| Michigan* |
7.5% |
20 |
| Georgia |
6.9% |
21 |
| Kentucky |
6.6% |
22 |
| Iowa |
6.6% |
23 |
| New Mexico* |
5.5% |
24 |
| Texas |
5.4% |
25 |
| Illinois |
4.9% |
26 |
| New Hampshire |
4.8% |
27 |
| Connecticut |
4.7% |
28 |
| New York* |
3.7% |
29 |
| Virginia |
3.5% |
30 |
| Indiana |
3.0% |
31 |
| Kansas* |
2.8% |
32 |
| Ohio |
2.6% |
33 |
| Alabama |
1.9% |
34 |
| North Carolina* |
1.7% |
35 |
| Florida |
0.6% |
36 |
| Rhode Island |
0.1% |
37 |
| Pennsylvania |
0.0% |
38 |
| Wisconsin* |
-0.2% |
39 |
| West Virginia |
-0.3% |
40 |
| New Jersey |
-0.6% |
41 |
| Montana* |
-0.7% |
42 |
| Washington* |
-0.7% |
43 |
| California* |
-0.9% |
44 |
| Wyoming* |
-1.9% |
45 |
| South Dakota* |
-3.6% |
46 |
| Minnesota* |
-4.8% |
47 |
| Maryland |
-6.2% |
48 |
| Oregon* |
-6.2% |
49 |
| Nevada* |
-6.6% |
50 |
| Alaska |
-8.5% |
51 |
|
* State has a FDPIR program and participants are included in their total
participant counts.
View previous years (2002 and 2001).
Home
| All
About FRAC | Current
News & Analysis
Federal
Food Programs | Hunger
in the US
FRAC's
Building Blocks Project | Campaign
to End Childhood Hunger
Publications
& Products | Contact
FRAC! | Site
Map
|